Difference between revisions of "TSC SWOT"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
**Proactive
 
**Proactive
  
*Weakness
+
*Weaknesses
 
**Limited time
 
**Limited time
 
**Limited control over resources
 
**Limited control over resources
Line 12: Line 12:
 
**Lack of effective process for bringing in external proposed standards.
 
**Lack of effective process for bringing in external proposed standards.
 
**Lack of clear definition of the endorsement of external standards
 
**Lack of clear definition of the endorsement of external standards
**Linkage with Strategic Initiatives
+
**Lack of linkage with HL7 Strategic Plan
  
 
*Opportunities
 
*Opportunities
 
**Business Architecture Model development offers improved Governance and Management to match existing Methodology strengths
 
**Business Architecture Model development offers improved Governance and Management to match existing Methodology strengths
 
**Change to Intellectual Property licensing at no cost  
 
**Change to Intellectual Property licensing at no cost  
**Increased uptake by national programs  
+
**Increased worldwide uptake (by transnational/regional programs)
 
**Clearly designate our product line and product identification
 
**Clearly designate our product line and product identification
 
**Emergence of new and contemporary technology including FHIR and semantic web ontologies
 
**Emergence of new and contemporary technology including FHIR and semantic web ontologies
**Leverage new membership benefits for IP management, help desk, user groups, and conformance testing, in dealing with technical issues.
+
**Respond to new opportunities for increasing membership  
**Provide mechanisms to allow vitality assessment throughout the organization; define criteria for trigger events: including ability to define processes for assessment, provide strategic and tactical guidance to the EC and Board.
+
**Provide mechanisms to allow vitality assessment throughout the organization
  
 
*Threats
 
*Threats
Line 31: Line 31:
 
**Keeping up with increased uptake of our standards (e.g. FHIR)
 
**Keeping up with increased uptake of our standards (e.g. FHIR)
 
**Lack of adequate governance, management, curation and support processes to manage our standards and the resulting profiles that are created.
 
**Lack of adequate governance, management, curation and support processes to manage our standards and the resulting profiles that are created.
 +
**Change to intellectual property licensing has created the need to adjust organizational processes to manage the impact of that change.
  
 
Approved by TSC 2014-09-13
 
Approved by TSC 2014-09-13

Revision as of 14:33, 3 October 2015

  • Strengths
    • Clear focus on delineated governance and management activities
    • Respected, committed, highly experienced membership
    • Support from HQ
    • Open, transparent, and responsive
    • Proactive
  • Weaknesses
    • Limited time
    • Limited control over resources
    • Inconsistent support from Board and Working Groups
    • Lack of effective process for bringing in external proposed standards.
    • Lack of clear definition of the endorsement of external standards
    • Lack of linkage with HL7 Strategic Plan
  • Opportunities
    • Business Architecture Model development offers improved Governance and Management to match existing Methodology strengths
    • Change to Intellectual Property licensing at no cost
    • Increased worldwide uptake (by transnational/regional programs)
    • Clearly designate our product line and product identification
    • Emergence of new and contemporary technology including FHIR and semantic web ontologies
    • Respond to new opportunities for increasing membership
    • Provide mechanisms to allow vitality assessment throughout the organization
  • Threats
    • Creating overheads without visible return
    • Improve Product Quality
    • Lack of confidence in standards management creates vacuum for Profiler/Enforcer creating their own healthcare interoperability standards
    • Increasing numbers of mandates coming from the US Realm
    • Lack of clear governance surrounding new member benefits e.g. user groups, help desk
    • Keeping up with increased uptake of our standards (e.g. FHIR)
    • Lack of adequate governance, management, curation and support processes to manage our standards and the resulting profiles that are created.
    • Change to intellectual property licensing has created the need to adjust organizational processes to manage the impact of that change.

Approved by TSC 2014-09-13