Difference between revisions of "2013-08-07 TRAC"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
|colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Members  
 
|colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Members  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| ||Pat Van Dyke|| ||Rick Haddorff|| regrets||Melva Peters
+
|x ||Pat Van Dyke||x ||Rick Haddorff|| regrets||Melva Peters
 
|-
 
|-
−
| ||John Quinn || ||Austin Kreisler|| || Ken McCaslin
+
|x ||John Quinn ||x ||Austin Kreisler|| || Ken McCaslin
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 34: Line 34:
 
*Review minutes of [[2013-07-10 TRAC]] , [[2013-07-31 TRAC]]
 
*Review minutes of [[2013-07-10 TRAC]] , [[2013-07-31 TRAC]]
 
*Firm up what we want to have as deliverables at the September, 2013 WGM in Cambridge
 
*Firm up what we want to have as deliverables at the September, 2013 WGM in Cambridge
−
*continue review of the mitigation strategies for the recent CDS projects' issues
+
*Continue review of the mitigation strategies for the recent CDS projects' issues
 
* Governance Point development see  
 
* Governance Point development see  
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7448/10738/%43%6f%6e%73%6f%6c%69%64%61%74%65%64%52%69%73%6b%41%73%73%65%73%73%6d%65%6e%74%32%30%31%33%30%37%31%30%2e%78%6c%73%78 updated spreadsheet]
 
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7448/10738/%43%6f%6e%73%6f%6c%69%64%61%74%65%64%52%69%73%6b%41%73%73%65%73%73%6d%65%6e%74%32%30%31%33%30%37%31%30%2e%78%6c%73%78 updated spreadsheet]
Line 45: Line 45:
  
 
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
 
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
 +
Pat convenes at 10:00 AM noting that she has not yet collected an introductory packet for Ken and expects to invite him later this week.
 +
*Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke
 +
*Review minutes of
 +
**[[2013-07-10 TRAC]] Austin moves approval seconded by Rick. Unanimously approved.
 +
**[[2013-07-31 TRAC]] Austin moves approval seconded by Rick. Unanimously approved.
 +
*Firm up what we want to have as deliverables at the September, 2013 WGM in Cambridge
 +
**Complete risk assessment round 1 (other things have been added on) with mitigation strategies for likelihood critical
 +
**Governance points around mitigation strategies
 +
**Show a process of how things are identified and brought into TRAC and brought to resolution, e.g. CDS issues.
 +
**Process needs to show the continuous feedback loop.
 +
**Discuss further next week. Pat will work up a skeleton on what's being done on critical/critical.
 +
**Rick asks if we'd be doing a presentation to TSC on the governance points. Need to estimate time for agenda planning, perhaps 30 minutes.
 +
*Continue review of the mitigation strategies for the recent CDS projects' issues
 +
**Austin reviews current state, shift of realm to US realm, content team review including Kai for Templates meeting tomorrow for the first time. U.S. Realm Task force for US Realm project coordination on the HL7 side meetings Wednesdays at 5 Eastern. Task force also needs to ensure the appropriate groups are participating in projects to develop the UV Realm versions of these standards. Content review includes Kai Heitmann (Templates), Jean Duteau (MnM with help from Lloyd on FHIR), Lorraine (ArB), Dale Nelson and Paul Knapp for ITS, Ken Rubin (SOA). No one from CGIT or Vocab at this time. Ballot dates dependent on ONC need for published document in October timeframe.
 +
**Content review team as short term answer to inter WG conflict, on methodology examination. Does this apply to our SI cross-artifact consistency? This is more like what the old ArB used to do. We may want to reconstitute a group that does so. Something for cross-product family governance process. John suggests reintroduction of a judiciary. Ad-hoc as needed or longer term basis needs to be considered.
 +
**Austin reports that Dave will put together each cycle a package for all PSS submitted for NIBs and submit to the SDs. That will be a process improvement.
 +
* Governance Point development see
 +
*[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7448/10738/%43%6f%6e%73%6f%6c%69%64%61%74%65%64%52%69%73%6b%41%73%73%65%73%73%6d%65%6e%74%32%30%31%33%30%37%31%30%2e%78%6c%73%78 updated spreadsheet]
 +
*Pat having connectivity issues, adjourned the meeting here to resume review next week.
  
−
 
+
Adjourned 10:45 AM
  
 
===Next Steps===
 
===Next Steps===
Line 52: Line 71:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/>
 
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/>
−
 
+
*Pat will invite Ken to join with background documentation package
  
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
 
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
 
*[[2013-08-14 TRAC]].
 
*[[2013-08-14 TRAC]].
−
 
−
*Agenda topic for the first call in August:  Firm up what we want to have deliverable at the Sept WGM
 
 
   
 
   
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 14:53, 7 August 2013

TSC Risk Assessment Committee (TRAC) Agenda/Minutes

back to TRAC page

Meeting Info/Attendees

TRAC Meeting Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#
GoToMeeting ID: 660-939-197

Date: 2013-08-07
Time: 10:00 AM U.S. Eastern
Facilitator: Pat Van Dyke Note taker(s): Lynn
Quorum n/a
Chair/CTO Members Members
x Pat Van Dyke x Rick Haddorff regrets Melva Peters
x John Quinn x Austin Kreisler Ken McCaslin

Agenda

  • Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke
  • Review minutes of 2013-07-10 TRAC , 2013-07-31 TRAC
  • Firm up what we want to have as deliverables at the September, 2013 WGM in Cambridge
  • Continue review of the mitigation strategies for the recent CDS projects' issues
  • Governance Point development see
  • updated spreadsheet
    • referred item on precept for a statement on whether an R2 project supersedes prior releases.
  • Continue reviewing the Risks that Melva identified from the survey
  • Action Items:
    • Pat will work on developing a straw man for separate criteria for informative ballot reconciliation in 6 months, for example.

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Pat convenes at 10:00 AM noting that she has not yet collected an introductory packet for Ken and expects to invite him later this week.

  • Agenda review and approval - Pat Van Dyke
  • Review minutes of
    • 2013-07-10 TRAC Austin moves approval seconded by Rick. Unanimously approved.
    • 2013-07-31 TRAC Austin moves approval seconded by Rick. Unanimously approved.
  • Firm up what we want to have as deliverables at the September, 2013 WGM in Cambridge
    • Complete risk assessment round 1 (other things have been added on) with mitigation strategies for likelihood critical
    • Governance points around mitigation strategies
    • Show a process of how things are identified and brought into TRAC and brought to resolution, e.g. CDS issues.
    • Process needs to show the continuous feedback loop.
    • Discuss further next week. Pat will work up a skeleton on what's being done on critical/critical.
    • Rick asks if we'd be doing a presentation to TSC on the governance points. Need to estimate time for agenda planning, perhaps 30 minutes.
  • Continue review of the mitigation strategies for the recent CDS projects' issues
    • Austin reviews current state, shift of realm to US realm, content team review including Kai for Templates meeting tomorrow for the first time. U.S. Realm Task force for US Realm project coordination on the HL7 side meetings Wednesdays at 5 Eastern. Task force also needs to ensure the appropriate groups are participating in projects to develop the UV Realm versions of these standards. Content review includes Kai Heitmann (Templates), Jean Duteau (MnM with help from Lloyd on FHIR), Lorraine (ArB), Dale Nelson and Paul Knapp for ITS, Ken Rubin (SOA). No one from CGIT or Vocab at this time. Ballot dates dependent on ONC need for published document in October timeframe.
    • Content review team as short term answer to inter WG conflict, on methodology examination. Does this apply to our SI cross-artifact consistency? This is more like what the old ArB used to do. We may want to reconstitute a group that does so. Something for cross-product family governance process. John suggests reintroduction of a judiciary. Ad-hoc as needed or longer term basis needs to be considered.
    • Austin reports that Dave will put together each cycle a package for all PSS submitted for NIBs and submit to the SDs. That will be a process improvement.
  • Governance Point development see
  • updated spreadsheet
  • Pat having connectivity issues, adjourned the meeting here to resume review next week.

Adjourned 10:45 AM

Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
  • Pat will invite Ken to join with background documentation package
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
Retrieved from "https://tscwiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=2013-08-07_TRAC&oldid=11987"