Difference between revisions of "FTSD-WGM-20080915"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
==Attendees==
 
==Attendees==
−
(Expected)
 
 
*Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS)
 
*Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS)
 +
** Dale Nelson
 
** Paul Knapp
 
** Paul Knapp
 +
** Charlie McCay
 
*Implementation/Conformance
 
*Implementation/Conformance
 
** Jason Rock
 
** Jason Rock
 +
** Jenni Puyenbroek
 +
** Frank Oemig
 +
** Dick Harding
 
*Infrastructure & Messaging (InM)
 
*Infrastructure & Messaging (InM)
−
*Scott Robertson
+
** Graham Grieve
 
*RIM-Based Application Architecture (RIMBAA)
 
*RIM-Based Application Architecture (RIMBAA)
−
** Peter Hendler
 
 
*Modeling & Methodology (MnM)
 
*Modeling & Methodology (MnM)
 
** Ioana Singureanu
 
** Ioana Singureanu
 +
** Lloyd McKenzie
 
** Woody Beeler
 
** Woody Beeler
 
*Security
 
*Security
 +
** Mike Davis
 +
** Bernd Blobel
 
*Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
 
*Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
 +
**Ken Rubin
 +
**Juha Mykkanen
 
*Templates
 
*Templates
 
*Vocabulary
 
*Vocabulary
−
** Russ Hamm
+
** Ted Klein
 +
** Beverly Knight
  
 
==Agenda==
 
==Agenda==
−
#''(05 min)'' Roll Call
+
 
−
#''(05 min)'' [[FTSD-ConCall-20080610|Approve Minutes]] Ted/Beverly unanimous & Jenni/Mike - unanimously Accepted the Agenda
+
<p>1. ''(05 min)'' Roll Call</p>
−
#''(10 min)'' Announcements: Strategic plans and SWOT analysis due ASAP, looking for project facilitator volunteer for the SD
+
<p>2. ''(05 min)'' [[FTSD-ConCall-20080610|Approve Minutes]] Ted/Beverly 17-0-0, Approve Agenda: Jenni/Mike - 17-0-0 </p>
−
#''(10 min)'' '''MnM Mission Charter Change''' [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/frs/download.php/406/MissionAndCharter.doc MnM Mission Charter Change] Ken/Mike unanimous Charlie/Ken: unanimous
+
<p>3.''(10 min)'' Announcements: Strategic plans and SWOT analysis due ASAP, looking for project facilitator volunteer for the SD</p>
−
#''(10 min)'' '''InM Work Group Mission Change''' [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/267/InM%20mission%20and%20Charter%20Revision.zip InM Mission Charter Change]- withdrawn, returned to WG
+
<p>4.''(10 min)'' '''MnM Mission Charter Change''' [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/frs/download.php/406/MissionAndCharter.doc MnM Mission Charter Change] Ken/Mike unanimous Charlie/Ken: 17-0-0</p>
 +
<p>5.''(10 min)'' '''InM Work Group Mission Change''' [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/267/InM%20mission%20and%20Charter%20Revision.zip InM Mission Charter Change]- withdrawn, returned to WG</p>
 
  Description: InM Mission Charter Change to represent recent changes: <br/>Java SIG realignment and reorganization, changes in scope, etc.
 
  Description: InM Mission Charter Change to represent recent changes: <br/>Java SIG realignment and reorganization, changes in scope, etc.
−
# (7.5 min) '''Scope issues ''' (Jason Rock)
+
<p>6. (7.5 min) '''Scope issues ''' (Jason Rock)</p>
−
 
 
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li>
 
<li>
 
Marketing WG initiated a project to establish a registry of CDA Implementation Guides even though ITC has an on-going registry project(s).
 
Marketing WG initiated a project to establish a registry of CDA Implementation Guides even though ITC has an on-going registry project(s).
−
Steering Division is asked to raise the issue to the TSC regarding better cooperation and coordination across work groups.  (Jason/Lloyd)  
+
Steering Division is asked to raise the issue to the TSC regarding better cooperation and coordination across work groups.  (Jason/Lloyd) 17-0-0
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
−
<li>We need to notify all co-chairs about proposed/intended projects (including Board-sponsored ones).</li>
+
<li>We need to notify all co-chairs about proposed/intended projects (including Board-sponsored ones). A SD acceptance or rejection of proposed projects is expected.</li>
 
<li>We need a better way to deal with board-sponsored vs. TSC sponsored project because they have a different approval process.</li>
 
<li>We need a better way to deal with board-sponsored vs. TSC sponsored project because they have a different approval process.</li>
 
<li>The TSC and SDs need to know if a work group is proposing something that affects the SD it should be communicated to the co-chairs and they should be provided an opportunity to raise any concerns.</li>
 
<li>The TSC and SDs need to know if a work group is proposing something that affects the SD it should be communicated to the co-chairs and they should be provided an opportunity to raise any concerns.</li>
 
<li>RSS feed to automate the broadcast of change notifications to the "project scope statement" place.</li>
 
<li>RSS feed to automate the broadcast of change notifications to the "project scope statement" place.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
−
</li>
 
−
<li>
 
 
</li>
 
</li>
  
−
# (5 min) ''' Core Principles Doc''' (Ted Klein)
+
<p>7. (5 min) ''' Core Principles Doc''' (Ted Klein) witdrawn</p>
−
# (10 min) '''SAEAF Discussion''' (Charlie McCay)
+
There is a question regarding reballoting "Core Principles" but Vocab is not willing to proceed with the Jan ballot due to the large number of comments. There may not be enough time to address the large number of substantive vocab comments.
−
#''(5 min)'' '''Other Business'''
+
* If any issues are raised across WGs in the SD, should they be raised to the SD?
 +
<p>8. (10 min) '''SAEAF Discussion''' (Charlie McCay)</p>
 +
SD to endorse the distribution of the following candidate documents not later than two weeks prior to the January WGM:
 +
* Plan documenting the acceptance and review process of the SAEAF.
 +
* Plan documenting the organizational adoption of the SAEAF post acceptance including technical and organizational impact analysis.
 +
* The proposed SAEAF including open issues and concerns.
 +
Ken Rubin/Woody Beeler 17-0-1
 +
<p>9.''(5 min)'' '''Other Business'''</p>
 +
<p> All the WG in the SD should reserve Q3-Q4, Wed for a discussion of the SAEAF.</p>
  
  

Latest revision as of 04:11, 16 September 2008

Foundation and Technology Steering Division Workgroup Meeting

FTSD - Foundation & Technology Steering Division

Attendees

  • Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS)
    • Dale Nelson
    • Paul Knapp
    • Charlie McCay
  • Implementation/Conformance
    • Jason Rock
    • Jenni Puyenbroek
    • Frank Oemig
    • Dick Harding
  • Infrastructure & Messaging (InM)
    • Graham Grieve
  • RIM-Based Application Architecture (RIMBAA)
  • Modeling & Methodology (MnM)
    • Ioana Singureanu
    • Lloyd McKenzie
    • Woody Beeler
  • Security
    • Mike Davis
    • Bernd Blobel
  • Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
    • Ken Rubin
    • Juha Mykkanen
  • Templates
  • Vocabulary
    • Ted Klein
    • Beverly Knight

Agenda

1. (05 min) Roll Call

2. (05 min) Approve Minutes Ted/Beverly 17-0-0, Approve Agenda: Jenni/Mike - 17-0-0

3.(10 min) Announcements: Strategic plans and SWOT analysis due ASAP, looking for project facilitator volunteer for the SD

4.(10 min) MnM Mission Charter Change MnM Mission Charter Change Ken/Mike unanimous Charlie/Ken: 17-0-0

5.(10 min) InM Work Group Mission Change InM Mission Charter Change- withdrawn, returned to WG

Description: InM Mission Charter Change to represent recent changes: 
Java SIG realignment and reorganization, changes in scope, etc.

6. (7.5 min) Scope issues (Jason Rock)

  • Marketing WG initiated a project to establish a registry of CDA Implementation Guides even though ITC has an on-going registry project(s). Steering Division is asked to raise the issue to the TSC regarding better cooperation and coordination across work groups. (Jason/Lloyd) 17-0-0
    • We need to notify all co-chairs about proposed/intended projects (including Board-sponsored ones). A SD acceptance or rejection of proposed projects is expected.
    • We need a better way to deal with board-sponsored vs. TSC sponsored project because they have a different approval process.
    • The TSC and SDs need to know if a work group is proposing something that affects the SD it should be communicated to the co-chairs and they should be provided an opportunity to raise any concerns.
    • RSS feed to automate the broadcast of change notifications to the "project scope statement" place.

    • 7. (5 min) Core Principles Doc (Ted Klein) witdrawn

    There is a question regarding reballoting "Core Principles" but Vocab is not willing to proceed with the Jan ballot due to the large number of comments. There may not be enough time to address the large number of substantive vocab comments.

    • If any issues are raised across WGs in the SD, should they be raised to the SD?

    8. (10 min) SAEAF Discussion (Charlie McCay)

    SD to endorse the distribution of the following candidate documents not later than two weeks prior to the January WGM:

    • Plan documenting the acceptance and review process of the SAEAF.
    • Plan documenting the organizational adoption of the SAEAF post acceptance including technical and organizational impact analysis.
    • The proposed SAEAF including open issues and concerns.

    Ken Rubin/Woody Beeler 17-0-1

    9.(5 min) Other Business

    All the WG in the SD should reserve Q3-Q4, Wed for a discussion of the SAEAF.



    Agenda items

    Action Item List

    Back to Meetings

Retrieved from "https://tscwiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=FTSD-WGM-20080915&oldid=3741"