Difference between revisions of "FTSD-WGM-20080915"

From HL7 TSC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 56: Line 56:
 
* Plan documenting the organizational adoption of the SAEAF post acceptance including technical and organizational impact analysis.
 
* Plan documenting the organizational adoption of the SAEAF post acceptance including technical and organizational impact analysis.
 
* The proposed SAEAF including open issues and concerns.
 
* The proposed SAEAF including open issues and concerns.
Ken Rubin/Woody Beeler  
+
Ken Rubin/Woody Beeler 17-0-1
 
<p>9.''(5 min)'' '''Other Business'''</p>
 
<p>9.''(5 min)'' '''Other Business'''</p>
  

Revision as of 03:56, 16 September 2008

Foundation and Technology Steering Division Workgroup Meeting

FTSD - Foundation & Technology Steering Division

Attendees

  • Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS)
    • Dale Nelson
    • Paul Knapp
  • Implementation/Conformance
    • Jason Rock
    • Jenni Puyenbroek
    • Frank Oemig
    • Dick Harding
  • Infrastructure & Messaging (InM)
  • Graham Grieve
  • RIM-Based Application Architecture (RIMBAA)
  • Modeling & Methodology (MnM)
    • Ioana Singureanu
    • Lloyd McKenzie
  • Security
    • Mike Davis
    • Bernd Blobel
  • Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
    • Ken Rubin
  • Templates
  • Vocabulary
    • Ted Klein
    • Beverly Knight

Agenda

1. (05 min) Roll Call

2. (05 min) Approve Minutes Ted/Beverly 17-0-0, Approve Agenda: Jenni/Mike - 17-0-0

3.(10 min) Announcements: Strategic plans and SWOT analysis due ASAP, looking for project facilitator volunteer for the SD

4.(10 min) MnM Mission Charter Change MnM Mission Charter Change Ken/Mike unanimous Charlie/Ken: 17-0-0

5.(10 min) InM Work Group Mission Change InM Mission Charter Change- withdrawn, returned to WG

Description: InM Mission Charter Change to represent recent changes: 
Java SIG realignment and reorganization, changes in scope, etc.

6. (7.5 min) Scope issues (Jason Rock)

  • Marketing WG initiated a project to establish a registry of CDA Implementation Guides even though ITC has an on-going registry project(s). Steering Division is asked to raise the issue to the TSC regarding better cooperation and coordination across work groups. (Jason/Lloyd) 17-0-0
    • We need to notify all co-chairs about proposed/intended projects (including Board-sponsored ones). A SD acceptance or rejection of proposed projects is expected.
    • We need a better way to deal with board-sponsored vs. TSC sponsored project because they have a different approval process.
    • The TSC and SDs need to know if a work group is proposing something that affects the SD it should be communicated to the co-chairs and they should be provided an opportunity to raise any concerns.
    • RSS feed to automate the broadcast of change notifications to the "project scope statement" place.
  • 7. (5 min) Core Principles Doc (Ted Klein) witdrawn

    There is a question regarding reballoting "Core Principles" but Vocab is not willing to proceed with the Jan ballot due to the large number of comments. There may not be enough time to address the large number of substantive vocab comments.

    • If any issues are raised across WGs in the SD, should they be raised to the SD?

    8. (10 min) SAEAF Discussion (Charlie McCay)

    SD to endorse the distribution of the following candidate documents not later than two weeks prior to the January WGM:

    • Plan documenting the acceptance and review process of the SAEAF.
    • Plan documenting the organizational adoption of the SAEAF post acceptance including technical and organizational impact analysis.
    • The proposed SAEAF including open issues and concerns.

    Ken Rubin/Woody Beeler 17-0-1

    9.(5 min) Other Business



    Agenda items

    Action Item List

    Back to Meetings