Difference between revisions of "FTSD-WGM-20080915"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
#''(05 min)'' Roll Call | #''(05 min)'' Roll Call | ||
| − | #''(05 min)'' [[FTSD-ConCall-20080610|Approve Minutes]] Ted/Beverly | + | #''(05 min)'' [[FTSD-ConCall-20080610|Approve Minutes]] Ted/Beverly 17-0-0, Approve Agenda: Jenni/Mike - 17-0-0 |
#''(10 min)'' Announcements: Strategic plans and SWOT analysis due ASAP, looking for project facilitator volunteer for the SD | #''(10 min)'' Announcements: Strategic plans and SWOT analysis due ASAP, looking for project facilitator volunteer for the SD | ||
| − | #''(10 min)'' '''MnM Mission Charter Change''' [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/frs/download.php/406/MissionAndCharter.doc MnM Mission Charter Change] Ken/Mike unanimous Charlie/Ken: | + | #''(10 min)'' '''MnM Mission Charter Change''' [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/frs/download.php/406/MissionAndCharter.doc MnM Mission Charter Change] Ken/Mike unanimous Charlie/Ken: 17-0-0 |
#''(10 min)'' '''InM Work Group Mission Change''' [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/267/InM%20mission%20and%20Charter%20Revision.zip InM Mission Charter Change]- withdrawn, returned to WG | #''(10 min)'' '''InM Work Group Mission Change''' [http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/docman/view.php/52/267/InM%20mission%20and%20Charter%20Revision.zip InM Mission Charter Change]- withdrawn, returned to WG | ||
Description: InM Mission Charter Change to represent recent changes: <br/>Java SIG realignment and reorganization, changes in scope, etc. | Description: InM Mission Charter Change to represent recent changes: <br/>Java SIG realignment and reorganization, changes in scope, etc. | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
Marketing WG initiated a project to establish a registry of CDA Implementation Guides even though ITC has an on-going registry project(s). | Marketing WG initiated a project to establish a registry of CDA Implementation Guides even though ITC has an on-going registry project(s). | ||
| − | Steering Division is asked to raise the issue to the TSC regarding better cooperation and coordination across work groups. (Jason/Lloyd) | + | Steering Division is asked to raise the issue to the TSC regarding better cooperation and coordination across work groups. (Jason/Lloyd) 17-0-0 |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>We need to notify all co-chairs about proposed/intended projects (including Board-sponsored ones). A SD acceptance or rejection of proposed projects is expected.</li> | <li>We need to notify all co-chairs about proposed/intended projects (including Board-sponsored ones). A SD acceptance or rejection of proposed projects is expected.</li> | ||
Revision as of 03:32, 16 September 2008
Contents
Foundation and Technology Steering Division Workgroup Meeting
FTSD - Foundation & Technology Steering Division
Attendees
- Implementable Technology Specifications (ITS)
- Dale Nelson
- Paul Knapp
- Implementation/Conformance
- Jason Rock
- Jenni Puyenbroek
- Frank Oemig
- Dick Harding
- Infrastructure & Messaging (InM)
- Graham Grieve
- RIM-Based Application Architecture (RIMBAA)
- Modeling & Methodology (MnM)
- Ioana Singureanu
- Lloyd McKenzie
- Security
- Mike Davis
- Bernd Blobel
- Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
- Ken Rubin
- Templates
- Vocabulary
- Ted Klein
- Beverly Knight
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call
- (05 min) Approve Minutes Ted/Beverly 17-0-0, Approve Agenda: Jenni/Mike - 17-0-0
- (10 min) Announcements: Strategic plans and SWOT analysis due ASAP, looking for project facilitator volunteer for the SD
- (10 min) MnM Mission Charter Change MnM Mission Charter Change Ken/Mike unanimous Charlie/Ken: 17-0-0
- (10 min) InM Work Group Mission Change InM Mission Charter Change- withdrawn, returned to WG
Description: InM Mission Charter Change to represent recent changes:
Java SIG realignment and reorganization, changes in scope, etc.
- (7.5 min) Scope issues (Jason Rock)
-
Marketing WG initiated a project to establish a registry of CDA Implementation Guides even though ITC has an on-going registry project(s).
Steering Division is asked to raise the issue to the TSC regarding better cooperation and coordination across work groups. (Jason/Lloyd) 17-0-0
- We need to notify all co-chairs about proposed/intended projects (including Board-sponsored ones). A SD acceptance or rejection of proposed projects is expected.
- We need a better way to deal with board-sponsored vs. TSC sponsored project because they have a different approval process.
- The TSC and SDs need to know if a work group is proposing something that affects the SD it should be communicated to the co-chairs and they should be provided an opportunity to raise any concerns.
- RSS feed to automate the broadcast of change notifications to the "project scope statement" place.
- (5 min) Core Principles Doc (Ted Klein) witdrawn
- If any issues are raised across WGs in the SD, should they be raised to the SD?
- (10 min) SAEAF Discussion (Charlie McCay)
- (5 min) Other Business
