Difference between revisions of "DESD PSS: Additional Attachments Templates"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 14:52, 18 October 2013
Return to Domain Experts Electronic Voting Summaries
Please vote on the PSS for Attachments WG. Enter your name and WG along with your vote. 1 vote per WG. Poll open until October 31, 2013.
Link to updated Project scope statement Attachments Additional Templates PSS
- Summary - Passed (15/0/0/5)
- Number of participants: 15
- Most popular option: Affirmative
- Votes in favour: 15
- Comments: 5
- Non-participating work groups counted as abstaining solely for the purpose of counting quorum: 0
' | Affirmative | Negative (with comments) | Abstain |
Craig Gabron (AWG) | OK | ||
Patty Craig (CQI) | OK | ||
Stephen Chu (PCWG) | OK | ||
John Walsh (Anesthesia) | OK | ||
Gaye Dolin (Child Health) | OK | ||
Suzanne Gonzales-Webb | OK | ||
Anita Walden (CIC) | OK | ||
Jim McClay (ECWG) | OK | ||
Amnon Shabo (CG) | OK | ||
Ken Pool (PHER) | OK | ||
Hugh Glover (Rx) | OK | ||
Melva Peters (DESD) | OK | ||
Ed Tripp (RCRIM) | OK | ||
John Rhoads (HCD) | OK | ||
JDL Nolen (AP) | OK | ||
Count | 15 | 0 | 0 |
Comments | ' |
Melva Peters (DESD) Wednesday, October 16, 2013 2:14:03 o'clock AM GMT-12:00 |
Section 3d must be completed with dates prior to submission to the TSC. Section 6 - Please add the date approved by the WG and the date approved by the Co-sponsoring WG. Review of PBS Metrics and WG for AWG: WGH - Healthiest in September 2013. PBS Metrics - 1 unpublished ballot and 2 idle ballots. |
Robert Dieterle Wednesday, October 16, 2013 12:54:41 o'clock AM GMT-12:00 |
Response to questions: 1)Medicare requires documentation that a service (e.g. lab testing, radiology, DME) was authorized by an appropriate licensed provider. This is true for all review/approval methods – prior authorization, pre-payment review, and post payment audit 2)timeline a) Notice of intent to ballot -- Nov 3, 2013 b) Submit for DSTU ballot -- December 8, 2013 c) Ballot period -- December 13, 2013 thru January 13, 2013 d) Present ballot at HL7 -- January HL7 meeting e) Reconcile Jan 2014 on |
Hugh Glover (Pharmacy) Wednesday, October 16, 2013 2:54:14 o'clock AM GMT-12:00 |
The risks identify "aggressive timescale" as an issue and say the sponsor's business needs are the driver but I didn't actually see any timescales identified. My approval is conditional on those timescales being completed before the PSS goes to the TSC. |
Stephen Chu (PCWG) Thursday, October 10, 2013 10:55:44 o'clock AM GMT-12:00" |
PSS Section 3a, third bullet point: "Completing the set of templates for completed and in-process orders required for documentation of provider authorization of the respective services. ..." Comment: It is unclear why for CMS (assume it is Centre for medicare/medicaid services) would require retrospective authorisation of completed orders? Relevant use cases include: retrospective authorization of emergency treatment, phone orders. Do CMS requirements cover these use cases? Are there other CMS requirements?" |
Anita Walden (CIC) Thursday, October 10, 201 10:02:28 o'clock AM GMT-12:00 |
The timeline section does look like it is completed. Will you provide the timelines for us. Thank you. |